Court weighs allowing courtroom cameras in George Floyd case

The trial of four former Minneapolis police officers charged in George Floyd’s death will generate massive public interest when it begins in March, but as it stands, most people who want to watch the proceedings will be out of luck. Supporters of audio and visual coverage say the high-profile nature of Floyd’s death, the outrage that led to worldwide protests, and courtroom restrictions caused by the coronavirus pandemic make this the right time and case to allow cameras in court. “I just can’t think of a situation where it’s more important than a case like this for the public to see what’s actually transpiring in the courtroom,” said Jane Kirtley, director of the Silha Center for the Study of Media Ethics and Law.

Johnny Thompson

Johnny Thompson is a senior reporter for Generator Research in Los Angeles, reporting on technology, business, finances, and more. He previously worked as a reporter for the Wall Street Journal and got his start at newspapers in New York, Connecticut, and Massachusetts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Post

A new book offers a rare glimpse inside North Korea's frozen-in-time tourist hotels

Tue Feb 9 , 2021
From poolside stands decorated with pumpkin vines to neon karaoke bars, Pyongyang’s tourist hotels look nothing like their exteriors make them seem. Related Posts:McConnell's legacy: Wielding majority power to reshape courtGOP senators confront past comments on Supreme Court voteVirus measures targeted by protesters despite case spikesIs 8 enough? Court vacancy […]